EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sahelanthropus or 'Sahelpithecus'?

Michel Brunet ()
Additional contact information
Michel Brunet: Faculté des Sciences et CNRS UMR 6046, Université de Poitiers

Nature, 2002, vol. 419, issue 6907, 582-582

Abstract: Abstract In 1925, when Dart described Australopithecus africanus1 as a hominid, critics interpreted it as a juvenile gorilla2,3,4. Last year, Wolpoff's colleagues (B.S. and M.P.) claimed that their Kenyan fossil Orrorin was a direct ancestor of Homo5, and now Wolpoff et al. conclude that Sahelanthropus was an ape (specifically, a female gorilla ancestor6) — a belief that, to our knowledge, is not supported by published or unpublished data.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/419582a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:419:y:2002:i:6907:d:10.1038_419582a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/419582a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:419:y:2002:i:6907:d:10.1038_419582a