Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice
S. Hattar,
R. J. Lucas,
N. Mrosovsky,
S. Thompson,
R. H. Douglas,
M. W. Hankins,
J. Lem,
M. Biel,
F. Hofmann,
R. G. Foster and
K.-W. Yau ()
Additional contact information
S. Hattar: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
R. J. Lucas: Imperial College London
N. Mrosovsky: University of Toronto
S. Thompson: Imperial College London
R. H. Douglas: City University
M. W. Hankins: Imperial College London
J. Lem: Tufts University School of Medicine
M. Biel: Lehrstuhl Pharmakologie für Naturwissenschaften, Zentrum für Pharmaforschung, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München
F. Hofmann: Technische Universität München
R. G. Foster: Imperial College London
K.-W. Yau: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Nature, 2003, vol. 424, issue 6944, 75-81
Abstract:
Abstract In the mammalian retina, besides the conventional rod–cone system, a melanopsin-associated photoreceptive system exists that conveys photic information for accessory visual functions such as pupillary light reflex and circadian photo-entrainment1,2,3,4,5,6,7. On ablation of the melanopsin gene, retinal ganglion cells that normally express melanopsin are no longer intrinsically photosensitive8. Furthermore, pupil reflex8, light-induced phase delays of the circadian clock9,10 and period lengthening of the circadian rhythm in constant light9,10 are all partially impaired. Here, we investigated whether additional photoreceptive systems participate in these responses. Using mice lacking rods and cones, we measured the action spectrum for phase-shifting the circadian rhythm of locomotor behaviour. This spectrum matches that for the pupillary light reflex in mice of the same genotype11, and that for the intrinsic photosensitivity of the melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells7. We have also generated mice lacking melanopsin coupled with disabled rod and cone phototransduction mechanisms. These animals have an intact retina but fail to show any significant pupil reflex, to entrain to light/dark cycles, and to show any masking response to light. Thus, the rod–cone and melanopsin systems together seem to provide all of the photic input for these accessory visual functions.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01761 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6944:d:10.1038_nature01761
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/
DOI: 10.1038/nature01761
Access Statistics for this article
Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper
More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().