Magnetic enhancement of superconductivity

H. A. Radovan (), N. A. Fortune, T. P. Murphy, S. T. Hannahs, E. C. Palm, S. W. Tozer and D. Hall
Additional contact information
H. A. Radovan: NHMFL, Florida State University
N. A. Fortune: NHMFL, Florida State University
T. P. Murphy: NHMFL, Florida State University
S. T. Hannahs: NHMFL, Florida State University
E. C. Palm: NHMFL, Florida State University
S. W. Tozer: NHMFL, Florida State University
D. Hall: NHMFL, Florida State University

Nature, 2004, vol. 427, issue 6977, 802-802

Abstract: Abstract Movshovich et al. suggest that our calorimetric observation of the FFLO superconducting phase boundary1 and its angular dependence are inconsistent with their own data reporting the possible presence of an FFLO phase, and that we have incorrectly used magnetothermal measurements to identify the order of the FFLO transition. They also contest that the correlation of the magnetization steps with the calorimetrically identified FFLO superconducting phase of CeCoIn5 is coincidental. We consider each of these points in turn.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/427802b Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:427:y:2004:i:6977:d:10.1038_427802b

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/427802b

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().