Ban on triazine herbicides likely to reduce but not negate relative benefits of GMHT maize cropping

J. N. Perry (), L. G. Firbank, G. T. Champion, S. J. Clark, M. S. Heard, M. J. May, C. Hawes, G. R. Squire, P. Rothery, I. P. Woiwod and J. D. Pidgeon
Additional contact information
J. N. Perry: Rothamsted Research
L. G. Firbank: NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
G. T. Champion: Broom's Barn Research Station
S. J. Clark: Rothamsted Research
M. S. Heard: NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
M. J. May: Broom's Barn Research Station
C. Hawes: Scottish Crop Research Institute
G. R. Squire: Scottish Crop Research Institute
P. Rothery: NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
I. P. Woiwod: Rothamsted Research
J. D. Pidgeon: Broom's Barn Research Station

Nature, 2004, vol. 428, issue 6980, 313-316

Abstract: Abstract The UK Farm-Scale Evaluations (FSE) compared the effects on biodiversity of management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) spring-sown crops with conventional crop management1. The FSE reported larger weed abundance under GMHT management for fodder maize2, one of three crops studied. Increased seed production may be important for the long-term persistence of these arable weeds and may benefit invertebrates, small mammals and seed-eating birds1. In three-quarters of FSE maize fields, growers used atrazine on the conventionally managed half, reflecting contemporary commercial practice3. Withdrawal of the triazine herbicides atrazine, simazine and cyanazine from approved lists of EU chemicals4 could therefore reduce or even reverse the reported benefits of GMHT maize1,2,5. Here we analyse effects of applications of triazine herbicides in conventional maize regimes on key indicators6, using FSE data. Weed abundances were decreased greatly relative to all other regimes whenever atrazine was applied before weeds emerged. Here, we forecast weed abundances in post-triazine herbicide regimes7,8. We predict weed abundances under future conventional herbicide management to be considerably larger than that for atrazine used before weeds emerged, but still smaller than for the four FSE sites analysed that used only non-triazine herbicides. Our overall conclusion is that the comparative benefits for arable biodiversity of GMHT maize cropping would be reduced, but not eliminated, by the withdrawal of triazines from conventional maize cropping.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02374 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:428:y:2004:i:6980:d:10.1038_nature02374

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature02374

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().