Superluminal speed of information? (reply)

Michael D. Stenner, Daniel J. Gauthier () and Mark A. Neifeld
Additional contact information
Michael D. Stenner: Duke University
Daniel J. Gauthier: Duke University
Mark A. Neifeld: The Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona

Nature, 2004, vol. 429, issue 6987, 40-40

Abstract: Abstract Stenner et al. reply — It was most natural to present our findings1 in the time domain, although there is an equivalent explanation in the frequency domain if Fourier analysis is used. Nimtz2 uses a frequency-domain argument to assert that our data with gaussian pulses (Fig. 1b in ref. 1) are consistent with the group-velocity approximation, whereas the data we used to measure the information velocity (Fig. 2 in ref. 1) are not; however, we disagree with his analysis.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02587 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:429:y:2004:i:6987:d:10.1038_nature02587

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature02587

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().