Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard

Jason J. Kolbe (), Richard E. Glor, Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino, Ada Chamizo Lara, Allan Larson and Jonathan B. Losos
Additional contact information
Jason J. Kolbe: Washington University
Richard E. Glor: Washington University
Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino: CITMA
Ada Chamizo Lara: CITMA
Allan Larson: Washington University
Jonathan B. Losos: Washington University

Nature, 2004, vol. 431, issue 7005, 177-181

Abstract: Abstract A genetic paradox1,2 exists in invasion biology: how do introduced populations, whose genetic variation has probably been depleted by population bottlenecks, persist and adapt to new conditions? Lessons from conservation genetics show that reduced genetic variation due to genetic drift and founder effects limits the ability of a population to adapt, and small population size increases the risk of extinction1,3,4. Nonetheless, many introduced species experiencing these same conditions during initial introductions persist, expand their ranges, evolve rapidly and become invasive. To address this issue, we studied the brown anole, a worldwide invasive lizard. Genetic analyses indicate that at least eight introductions have occurred in Florida from across this lizard's native range, blending genetic variation from different geographic source populations and producing populations that contain substantially more, not less, genetic variation than native populations. Moreover, recently introduced brown anole populations around the world originate from Florida, and some have maintained these elevated levels of genetic variation. Here we show that one key to invasion success may be the occurrence of multiple introductions that transform among-population variation in native ranges to within-population variation in introduced areas. Furthermore, these genetically variable populations may be particularly potent sources for introductions elsewhere. The growing problem of invasive species introductions brings considerable economic and biological costs5,6. If these costs are to be mitigated, a greater understanding of the causes, progression and consequences of biological invasions is needed7.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02807 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7005:d:10.1038_nature02807

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature02807

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().