Is the ID debate proof of an intelligent deceiver?

A. Richard Palmer
Additional contact information
A. Richard Palmer: Systematics and Evolution Group, University of Alberta

Nature, 2005, vol. 438, issue 7067, 422-422

Abstract: The third way Here's an olive branch for those eager to teach ‘intelligent design’ as an alternative to evolution in the classroom. Go ahead but include a third option, the ‘intelligent deceiver’, determined to sow confusion over valid scientific debate.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/438422c Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:438:y:2005:i:7067:d:10.1038_438422c

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/438422c

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().