DNA analysis of a putative dog clone

Heidi G. Parker, Leonid Kruglyak and Elaine A. Ostrander ()
Additional contact information
Heidi G. Parker: Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
Leonid Kruglyak: Princeton University
Elaine A. Ostrander: Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health

Nature, 2006, vol. 440, issue 7081, E1-E2

Abstract: Snuppy verdict The revelations about fraudulent human cloning papers from the lab of Woo Suk Hwang raised doubts over a paper in Nature last August claiming that two Afghan hounds had been cloned. Two independent DNA analyses of ‘Snuppy’, the surviving putatively cloned dog, and of his nuclear- and egg-donor ‘parents’ appear online this week. The data are consistent with Snuppy being a genuine genetic clone of the nuclear-donor dog Tai.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04685 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7081:d:10.1038_nature04685

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature04685

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().