Ethics of using employees' eggs in cloning research

Susan Hawes and Justin Oakley
Additional contact information
Susan Hawes: Monash University
Justin Oakley: Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University

Nature, 2006, vol. 440, issue 7087, 992-992

Abstract: Too much! Consider the poor reviewer. These days papers sent to life sciences journals often carry with them a daunting amount of data. This is especially true of ‘omics’ datasets such as genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. (Nature this week adds pharmaco-metabonomics to the list). Can a busy referee really have the time to wade through all these data? This week a toxicogenomics practitioner makes a plea for some respite. Referees are only human, he says, but are now being asked to do a superhuman task on a near-daily basis.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/440992a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7087:d:10.1038_440992a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/440992a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().