Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex

Anthony Holtmaat, Linda Wilbrecht, Graham W. Knott, Egbert Welker and Karel Svoboda ()
Additional contact information
Anthony Holtmaat: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Linda Wilbrecht: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Graham W. Knott: Institut de biologie cellulaire et de morphologie (IBCM), Université de Lausanne
Egbert Welker: Institut de biologie cellulaire et de morphologie (IBCM), Université de Lausanne
Karel Svoboda: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Nature, 2006, vol. 441, issue 7096, 979-983

Abstract: Abstract Functional circuits in the adult neocortex adjust to novel sensory experience, but the underlying synaptic mechanisms remain unknown1. Growth and retraction of dendritic spines with synapse formation and elimination could change brain circuits2,3,4,5,6,7. In the apical tufts of layer 5B (L5B) pyramidal neurons in the mouse barrel cortex, a subset of dendritic spines appear and disappear over days, whereas most spines are persistent for months4,5,6,8,9. Under baseline conditions, new spines are mostly transient and rarely survive for more than a week. Transient spines tend to be small4,5,9, whereas persistent spines are usually large4,5,6,8,9. Because most excitatory synapses in the cortex occur on spines, and because synapse size10 and the number of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors11,12,13 are proportional to spine volume, the excitation of pyramidal neurons is probably driven through synapses on persistent spines. Here we test whether the generation and loss of persistent spines are enhanced by novel sensory experience. We repeatedly imaged dendritic spines for one month after trimming alternate whiskers, a paradigm that induces adaptive functional changes in neocortical circuits14,15. Whisker trimming stabilized new spines and destabilized previously persistent spines. New-persistent spines always formed synapses. They were preferentially added on L5B neurons with complex apical tufts rather than simple tufts. Our data indicate that novel sensory experience drives the stabilization of new spines on subclasses of cortical neurons. These synaptic changes probably underlie experience-dependent remodelling of specific neocortical circuits.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04783 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:441:y:2006:i:7096:d:10.1038_nature04783

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature04783

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().