Causes of trends in amino-acid gain and loss
Laurence D. Hurst (),
Edward J. Feil and
Eduardo P. C. Rocha
Additional contact information
Laurence D. Hurst: University of Bath
Edward J. Feil: University of Bath
Eduardo P. C. Rocha: Atelier de BioInformatique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Nature, 2006, vol. 442, issue 7105, E11-E12
Abstract:
Abstract Arising from: I. K. Jordan et al. Nature 433, 633–638 (2005); Jordan et al. reply Understanding how proteins evolve is important for determining the molecular basis of adaptation, for inferring phylogenies and for engineering novel proteins. It has been suggested that some amino acids were incorporated into the genetic code more recently than others1 and, after comparing pairs of closely related genomes, Jordan et al.2 report that 'recent' amino acids are becoming more common. They argue that this process has been going on since the genetic code first evolved to encompass all 20 amino acids. Here we provide evidence that the patterns observed conform with standard, nearly neutral theoretical expectations3 and require no new explanation. This reinforces the need for caution in the interpretation of results derived from closely related taxa.
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05137 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:442:y:2006:i:7105:d:10.1038_nature05137
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/
DOI: 10.1038/nature05137
Access Statistics for this article
Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper
More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().