A synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity

Robert C. Froemke (), Michael M. Merzenich and Christoph E. Schreiner
Additional contact information
Robert C. Froemke: Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
Michael M. Merzenich: Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
Christoph E. Schreiner: Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA

Nature, 2007, vol. 450, issue 7168, 425-429

Abstract: Abstract Receptive fields of sensory cortical neurons are plastic, changing in response to alterations of neural activity or sensory experience1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In this way, cortical representations of the sensory environment can incorporate new information about the world, depending on the relevance or value of particular stimuli1,6,9. Neuromodulation is required for cortical plasticity, but it is uncertain how subcortical neuromodulatory systems, such as the cholinergic nucleus basalis, interact with and refine cortical circuits13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Here we determine the dynamics of synaptic receptive field plasticity in the adult primary auditory cortex (also known as AI) using in vivo whole-cell recording. Pairing sensory stimulation with nucleus basalis activation shifted the preferred stimuli of cortical neurons by inducing a rapid reduction of synaptic inhibition within seconds, which was followed by a large increase in excitation, both specific to the paired stimulus. Although nucleus basalis was stimulated only for a few minutes, reorganization of synaptic tuning curves progressed for hours thereafter: inhibition slowly increased in an activity-dependent manner to rebalance the persistent enhancement of excitation, leading to a retuned receptive field with new preference for the paired stimulus. This restricted period of disinhibition may be a fundamental mechanism for receptive field plasticity, and could serve as a memory trace9,25 for stimuli or episodes that have acquired new behavioural significance.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06289 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7168:d:10.1038_nature06289

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature06289

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().