EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Yancheva et al. reply

Gergana Yancheva, Norbert R. Nowaczyk, Jens Mingram, Peter Dulski, Georg Schettler, Jörg F. W. Negendank, Jiaqi Liu, Daniel M. Sigman, Larry C. Peterson and Gerald H. Haug ()
Additional contact information
Gergana Yancheva: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Norbert R. Nowaczyk: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Jens Mingram: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Peter Dulski: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Georg Schettler: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Jörg F. W. Negendank: GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Jiaqi Liu: † Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
Daniel M. Sigman: Princeton University
Larry C. Peterson: Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami
Gerald H. Haug: Geological Institute

Nature, 2007, vol. 450, issue 7168, E8-E9

Abstract: Abstract Replying to: De’er Zhang & Longhua Lu Nature 450, doi:10.1038/nature06338 (2007) Zhang and Lu1 argue that Chinese historical climate records contradict certain of our interpretations2 based on Lake Huguang Maar sediment records. Interpreting these records as an indicator for winter monsoon winds and Chinese cave records as an indicator for summer monsoon rainfall3, we observed2 an inverse relationship between winter and summer monsoons on a millennial timescale over the past 16,000 yr. In sediments deposited during the period of Classical Chinese dynastic history, we found evidence for a temporal coincidence between winter monsoon strengthening and the terminations of important dynasties2. Extrapolating the inverse monsoon relationship to these multidecadal timescales, we suggested that reduced summer rainfall contributed to dynastic terminations, including that of the Tang (ad 618–907). Zhang and Lu1 challenge the validity of the summer/winter monsoon relationship on the grounds that historical records indicate that relatively cold winters tended to be associated with relatively wet summers over the period they considered. They argue that the Tang dynasty decline was associated with cold winters, in agreement with our findings2, but they find no evidence for rainfall changes having contributed to the decline of the Tang.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06339 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7168:d:10.1038_nature06339

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature06339

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7168:d:10.1038_nature06339