In defence of inclusive fitness theory

Edward Allen Herre () and William T. Wcislo
Additional contact information
Edward Allen Herre: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama
William T. Wcislo: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama

Nature, 2011, vol. 471, issue 7339, E8-E9

Abstract: Abstract Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205 ; Nowak et al. reply Arguably the defining characteristic of the scientific process is its capacity for self-criticism and correction1. Nowak et al.2 challenge proposed connections between relatedness and the evolution of eusociality3, suggest instead that defensible nests and “spring-loaded” traits are key, and present alternative modelling approaches. They then dismiss the utility of Hamilton’s insight that relatedness has a profound evolutionary effect3, formalized in his widely accepted inclusive fitness theory as Hamilton’s rule (“Rise and fall of inclusive fitness theory”). However, we believe that Nowak et al.2 fail to make their case for logical, theoretical and empirical reasons.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09835 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:471:y:2011:i:7339:d:10.1038_nature09835

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature09835

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().