EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

When antioxidants are bad

Rushika M. Perera () and Nabeel Bardeesy ()
Additional contact information
Rushika M. Perera: Rushika M. Perera and Nabeel Bardeesy are at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Nabeel Bardeesy: Rushika M. Perera and Nabeel Bardeesy are at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

Nature, 2011, vol. 475, issue 7354, 43-44

Abstract: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) get a bad press, as evidenced by the notable trend in the use of dietary and cosmetic antioxidants. New work suggests, however, that ROS might have a role in mitigating certain cancers. See Letter p.106

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/475043a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:475:y:2011:i:7354:d:10.1038_475043a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/475043a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:475:y:2011:i:7354:d:10.1038_475043a