The paper is not sacred

Adam Marcus () and Ivan Oransky ()
Additional contact information
Adam Marcus: Adam Marcus is co-creator of Retraction Watch (retractionwatch.com).
Ivan Oransky: Ivan Oransky is co-creator of Retraction Watch (retractionwatch.com).

Nature, 2011, vol. 480, issue 7378, 449-450

Abstract: Peer review continues long after a paper is published, and that analysis should become part of the scientific record, say Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/480449a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:480:y:2011:i:7378:d:10.1038_480449a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/480449a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().