Erratum: A strong ultraviolet pulse from a newborn type Ia supernova

Yi Cao, S. R. Kulkarni, D. Andrew Howell, Avishay Gal-Yam, Mansi M. Kasliwal, Stefano Valenti, J. Johansson, R. Amanullah, A. Goobar, J. Sollerman, F. Taddia, Assaf Horesh, Ilan Sagiv, S. Bradley Cenko, Peter E. Nugent, Iair Arcavi, Jason Surace, P. R. Woźniak, Daniela I. Moody, Umaa D. Rebbapragada, Brian D. Bue and Neil Gehrels

Nature, 2015, vol. 524, issue 7566, 502-502

Abstract: Nature 521, 328–331 (2015); doi:10.1038/nature14440 In this Letter, the superscript in the ultraviolet luminosity was listed incorrectly as ‘−41’ rather than ‘41’ in the last sentence of the second paragraph from the bottom in the left column of page 1. It should have read L UV ≈ 3 × 1041 erg s−1. This has been corrected online.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14605 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:524:y:2015:i:7566:d:10.1038_nature14605

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/nature14605

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().