Forensic DNA evidence is not infallible

Cynthia M. Cale ()
Additional contact information
Cynthia M. Cale: Cynthia M. Cale is a human-biology graduate student at the University of Indianapolis, Indiana, and lead forensic DNA analyst III at Strand Diagnostics.

Nature, 2015, vol. 526, issue 7575, 611-611

Abstract: As DNA analysis techniques become more sensitive, we must be careful to reassess the probabilities of error, argues Cynthia M. Cale.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/526611a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:526:y:2015:i:7575:d:10.1038_526611a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/526611a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().