Replications, ridicule and a recluse: the controversy over NgAgo gene-editing intensifies

David Cyranoski

Nature, 2016, vol. 536, issue 7615, 136-137

Abstract: As failures to replicate results using the CRISPR alternative stack up, a quiet scientist stands by his claims.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/536136a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:536:y:2016:i:7615:d:10.1038_536136a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/536136a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().