Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast

Benjamin List ()

Nature, 2017, vol. 546, issue 7656, 9-9

Abstract: Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions, explains Benjamin List.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/546009a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:546:y:2017:i:7656:d:10.1038_546009a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/546009a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().