Highly durable, coking and sulfur tolerant, fuel-flexible protonic ceramic fuel cells

Chuancheng Duan (), Robert J. Kee, Huayang Zhu, Canan Karakaya, Yachao Chen, Sandrine Ricote, Angelique Jarry, Ethan J. Crumlin, David Hook, Robert Braun, Neal P. Sullivan and Ryan O’Hayre ()
Additional contact information
Chuancheng Duan: Colorado School of Mines
Robert J. Kee: Colorado School of Mines
Huayang Zhu: Colorado School of Mines
Canan Karakaya: Colorado School of Mines
Yachao Chen: Colorado School of Mines
Sandrine Ricote: Colorado School of Mines
Angelique Jarry: University of Maryland
Ethan J. Crumlin: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David Hook: CoorsTek
Robert Braun: Colorado School of Mines
Neal P. Sullivan: Colorado School of Mines
Ryan O’Hayre: Colorado School of Mines

Nature, 2018, vol. 557, issue 7704, 217-222

Abstract: Abstract Protonic ceramic fuel cells, like their higher-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell counterparts, can directly use both hydrogen and hydrocarbon fuels to produce electricity at potentially more than 50 per cent efficiency1,2. Most previous direct-hydrocarbon fuel cell research has focused on solid-oxide fuel cells based on oxygen-ion-conducting electrolytes, but carbon deposition (coking) and sulfur poisoning typically occur when such fuel cells are directly operated on hydrocarbon- and/or sulfur-containing fuels, resulting in severe performance degradation over time3–6. Despite studies suggesting good performance and anti-coking resistance in hydrocarbon-fuelled protonic ceramic fuel cells2,7,8, there have been no systematic studies of long-term durability. Here we present results from long-term testing of protonic ceramic fuel cells using a total of 11 different fuels (hydrogen, methane, domestic natural gas (with and without hydrogen sulfide), propane, n-butane, i-butane, iso-octane, methanol, ethanol and ammonia) at temperatures between 500 and 600 degrees Celsius. Several cells have been tested for over 6,000 hours, and we demonstrate excellent performance and exceptional durability (less than 1.5 per cent degradation per 1,000 hours in most cases) across all fuels without any modifications in the cell composition or architecture. Large fluctuations in temperature are tolerated, and coking is not observed even after thousands of hours of continuous operation. Finally, sulfur, a notorious poison for both low-temperature and high-temperature fuel cells, does not seem to affect the performance of protonic ceramic fuel cells when supplied at levels consistent with commercial fuels. The fuel flexibility and long-term durability demonstrated by the protonic ceramic fuel cell devices highlight the promise of this technology and its potential for commercial application.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0082-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:557:y:2018:i:7704:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0082-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0082-6

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().