EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries

Chengcheng Fang, Jinxing Li, Minghao Zhang, Yihui Zhang, Fan Yang, Jungwoo Z. Lee, Min-Han Lee, Judith Alvarado, Marshall A. Schroeder, Yangyuchen Yang, Bingyu Lu, Nicholas Williams, Miguel Ceja, Li Yang, Mei Cai, Jing Gu, Kang Xu, Xuefeng Wang and Ying Shirley Meng ()
Additional contact information
Chengcheng Fang: University of California San Diego
Jinxing Li: University of California San Diego
Minghao Zhang: University of California San Diego
Yihui Zhang: University of California San Diego
Fan Yang: San Diego State University
Jungwoo Z. Lee: University of California San Diego
Min-Han Lee: University of California San Diego
Judith Alvarado: University of California San Diego
Marshall A. Schroeder: US Army Research Laboratory
Yangyuchen Yang: University of California San Diego
Bingyu Lu: University of California San Diego
Nicholas Williams: San Diego State University
Miguel Ceja: University of California San Diego
Li Yang: General Motors Research and Development Center
Mei Cai: General Motors Research and Development Center
Jing Gu: San Diego State University
Kang Xu: US Army Research Laboratory
Xuefeng Wang: University of California San Diego
Ying Shirley Meng: University of California San Diego

Nature, 2019, vol. 572, issue 7770, 511-515

Abstract: Abstract Lithium metal anodes offer high theoretical capacities (3,860 milliampere-hours per gram)1, but rechargeable batteries built with such anodes suffer from dendrite growth and low Coulombic efficiency (the ratio of charge output to charge input), preventing their commercial adoption2,3. The formation of inactive (‘dead’) lithium— which consists of both (electro)chemically formed Li+ compounds in the solid electrolyte interphase and electrically isolated unreacted metallic Li0 (refs 4,5)—causes capacity loss and safety hazards. Quantitatively distinguishing between Li+ in components of the solid electrolyte interphase and unreacted metallic Li0 has not been possible, owing to the lack of effective diagnostic tools. Optical microscopy6, in situ environmental transmission electron microscopy7,8, X-ray microtomography9 and magnetic resonance imaging10 provide a morphological perspective with little chemical information. Nuclear magnetic resonance11, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy12 and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy13,14 can distinguish between Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase and metallic Li0, but their detection ranges are limited to surfaces or local regions. Here we establish the analytical method of titration gas chromatography to quantify the contribution of unreacted metallic Li0 to the total amount of inactive lithium. We identify the unreacted metallic Li0, not the (electro)chemically formed Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase, as the dominant source of inactive lithium and capacity loss. By coupling the unreacted metallic Li0 content to observations of its local microstructure and nanostructure by cryogenic electron microscopy (both scanning and transmission), we also establish the formation mechanism of inactive lithium in different types of electrolytes and determine the underlying cause of low Coulombic efficiency in plating and stripping (the charge and discharge processes, respectively, in a full cell) of lithium metal anodes. We propose strategies for making lithium plating and stripping more efficient so that lithium metal anodes can be used for next-generation high-energy batteries.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1481-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7770:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1481-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7770:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1481-z