Evaluating drug targets through human loss-of-function genetic variation
Eric Vallabh Minikel (),
Konrad J. Karczewski,
Hilary C. Martin,
Beryl B. Cummings,
Nicola Whiffin,
Daniel Rhodes,
Jessica Alföldi,
Richard C. Trembath,
David A. Heel,
Mark J. Daly,
Stuart L. Schreiber and
Daniel G. MacArthur ()
Additional contact information
Eric Vallabh Minikel: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Konrad J. Karczewski: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Hilary C. Martin: Wellcome Sanger Institute
Beryl B. Cummings: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Nicola Whiffin: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Daniel Rhodes: Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust
Jessica Alföldi: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Richard C. Trembath: King’s College London
David A. Heel: Queen Mary University of London
Mark J. Daly: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Stuart L. Schreiber: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Daniel G. MacArthur: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Nature, 2020, vol. 581, issue 7809, 459-464
Abstract:
Abstract Naturally occurring human genetic variants that are predicted to inactivate protein-coding genes provide an in vivo model of human gene inactivation that complements knockout studies in cells and model organisms. Here we report three key findings regarding the assessment of candidate drug targets using human loss-of-function variants. First, even essential genes, in which loss-of-function variants are not tolerated, can be highly successful as targets of inhibitory drugs. Second, in most genes, loss-of-function variants are sufficiently rare that genotype-based ascertainment of homozygous or compound heterozygous ‘knockout’ humans will await sample sizes that are approximately 1,000 times those presently available, unless recruitment focuses on consanguineous individuals. Third, automated variant annotation and filtering are powerful, but manual curation remains crucial for removing artefacts, and is a prerequisite for recall-by-genotype efforts. Our results provide a roadmap for human knockout studies and should guide the interpretation of loss-of-function variants in drug development.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2267-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7809:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2267-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2267-z
Access Statistics for this article
Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper
More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().