EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes

Laurits Skov (), Moisès Coll Macià, Garðar Sveinbjörnsson, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Elise A. Lucotte, Margret S. Einarsdóttir, Hakon Jonsson, Bjarni Halldorsson, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Agnar Helgason, Mikkel Heide Schierup () and Kari Stefansson ()
Additional contact information
Laurits Skov: Aarhus University
Moisès Coll Macià: Aarhus University
Garðar Sveinbjörnsson: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Fabrizio Mafessoni: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Elise A. Lucotte: Aarhus University
Margret S. Einarsdóttir: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Hakon Jonsson: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Bjarni Halldorsson: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Daniel F. Gudbjartsson: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Agnar Helgason: deCODE Genetics, Amgen
Mikkel Heide Schierup: Aarhus University
Kari Stefansson: deCODE Genetics, Amgen

Nature, 2020, vol. 582, issue 7810, 78-83

Abstract: Abstract Human evolutionary history is rich with the interbreeding of divergent populations. Most humans outside of Africa trace about 2% of their genomes to admixture from Neanderthals, which occurred 50–60 thousand years ago1. Here we examine the effect of this event using 14.4 million putative archaic chromosome fragments that were detected in fully phased whole-genome sequences from 27,566 Icelanders, corresponding to a range of 56,388–112,709 unique archaic fragments that cover 38.0–48.2% of the callable genome. On the basis of the similarity with known archaic genomes, we assign 84.5% of fragments to an Altai or Vindija Neanderthal origin and 3.3% to Denisovan origin; 12.2% of fragments are of unknown origin. We find that Icelanders have more Denisovan-like fragments than expected through incomplete lineage sorting. This is best explained by Denisovan gene flow, either into ancestors of the introgressing Neanderthals or directly into humans. A within-individual, paired comparison of archaic fragments with syntenic non-archaic fragments revealed that, although the overall rate of mutation was similar in humans and Neanderthals during the 500 thousand years that their lineages were separate, there were differences in the relative frequencies of mutation types—perhaps due to different generation intervals for males and females. Finally, we assessed 271 phenotypes, report 5 associations driven by variants in archaic fragments and show that the majority of previously reported associations are better explained by non-archaic variants.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2225-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7810:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2225-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2225-9

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7810:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2225-9