Electron-beam energy reconstruction for neutrino oscillation measurements

M. Khachatryan, A. Papadopoulou, A. Ashkenazi (), F. Hauenstein, A. Nambrath, A. Hrnjic, L. B. Weinstein, O. Hen, E. Piasetzky, M. Betancourt, S. Dytman, K. Mahn and P. Coloma
Additional contact information
M. Khachatryan: Old Dominion University
A. Papadopoulou: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A. Ashkenazi: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
F. Hauenstein: Old Dominion University
A. Nambrath: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A. Hrnjic: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
L. B. Weinstein: Old Dominion University
O. Hen: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
E. Piasetzky: Tel Aviv University
M. Betancourt: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
S. Dytman: University of Pittsburgh
K. Mahn: Michigan State University
P. Coloma: Instituto de Física Corpuscular, Universidad de Valencia and CSIC

Nature, 2021, vol. 599, issue 7886, 565-570

Abstract: Abstract Neutrinos exist in one of three types or ‘flavours’—electron, muon and tau neutrinos—and oscillate from one flavour to another when propagating through space. This phenomena is one of the few that cannot be described using the standard model of particle physics (reviewed in ref. 1), and so its experimental study can provide new insight into the nature of our Universe (reviewed in ref. 2). Neutrinos oscillate as a function of their propagation distance (L) divided by their energy (E). Therefore, experiments extract oscillation parameters by measuring their energy distribution at different locations. As accelerator-based oscillation experiments cannot directly measure E, the interpretation of these experiments relies heavily on phenomenological models of neutrino–nucleus interactions to infer E. Here we exploit the similarity of electron–nucleus and neutrino–nucleus interactions, and use electron scattering data with known beam energies to test energy reconstruction methods and interaction models. We find that even in simple interactions where no pions are detected, only a small fraction of events reconstruct to the correct incident energy. More importantly, widely used interaction models reproduce the reconstructed energy distribution only qualitatively and the quality of the reproduction varies strongly with beam energy. This shows both the need and the pathway to improve current models to meet the requirements of next-generation, high-precision experiments such as Hyper-Kamiokande (Japan)3 and DUNE (USA)4.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04046-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:599:y:2021:i:7886:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04046-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04046-5

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().