Retrotransposons hijack alt-EJ for DNA replication and eccDNA biogenesis

Fu Yang, Weijia Su, Oliver W. Chung, Lauren Tracy, Lu Wang, Dale A. Ramsden and Zhao Zhang Zz ()
Additional contact information
Fu Yang: Duke University School of Medicine
Weijia Su: Duke University School of Medicine
Oliver W. Chung: Duke University School of Medicine
Lauren Tracy: Duke University School of Medicine
Lu Wang: Duke University School of Medicine
Dale A. Ramsden: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Zhao Zhang Zz: Duke University School of Medicine

Nature, 2023, vol. 620, issue 7972, 218-225

Abstract: Abstract Retrotransposons are highly enriched in the animal genome1–3. The activation of retrotransposons can rewrite host DNA information and fundamentally impact host biology1–3. Although developmental activation of retrotransposons can offer benefits for the host, such as against virus infection, uncontrolled activation promotes disease or potentially drives ageing1–5. After activation, retrotransposons use their mRNA as templates to synthesize double-stranded DNA for making new insertions in the host genome1–3,6. Although the reverse transcriptase that they encode can synthesize the first-strand DNA1–3,6, how the second-strand DNA is generated remains largely unclear. Here we report that retrotransposons hijack the alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) DNA repair process of the host for a circularization step to synthesize their second-strand DNA. We used Nanopore sequencing to examine the fates of replicated retrotransposon DNA, and found that 10% of them achieve new insertions, whereas 90% exist as extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA). Using eccDNA production as a readout, further genetic screens identified factors from alt-EJ as essential for retrotransposon replication. alt-EJ drives the second-strand synthesis of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon DNA through a circularization process and is therefore necessary for eccDNA production and new insertions. Together, our study reveals that alt-EJ is essential in driving the propagation of parasitic genomic retroelements. Our study uncovers a conserved function of this understudied DNA repair process, and provides a new perspective to understand—and potentially control—the retrotransposon life cycle.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06327-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:620:y:2023:i:7972:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06327-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06327-7

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().