Molecular mechanism of ligand gating and opening of NMDA receptor

Tsung-Han Chou, Max Epstein, Russell G. Fritzemeier, Nicholas S. Akins, Srinu Paladugu, Elijah Z. Ullman, Dennis C. Liotta, Stephen F. Traynelis and Hiro Furukawa ()
Additional contact information
Tsung-Han Chou: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Max Epstein: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Russell G. Fritzemeier: Emory University
Nicholas S. Akins: Emory University
Srinu Paladugu: Emory University
Elijah Z. Ullman: Emory University School of Medicine
Dennis C. Liotta: Emory University
Stephen F. Traynelis: Emory University School of Medicine
Hiro Furukawa: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Nature, 2024, vol. 632, issue 8023, 209-217

Abstract: Abstract Glutamate transmission and activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors are the fundamental means by which neurons control their excitability and neuroplasticity1. The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is unique among all ligand-gated channels, requiring two ligands—glutamate and glycine—for activation. These receptors function as heterotetrameric ion channels, with the channel opening dependent on the simultaneous binding of glycine and glutamate to the extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of the GluN1 and GluN2 subunits, respectively2,3. The exact molecular mechanism for channel gating by the two ligands has been unclear, particularly without structures representing the open channel and apo states. Here we show that the channel gate opening requires tension in the linker connecting the LBD and transmembrane domain (TMD) and rotation of the extracellular domain relative to the TMD. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we captured the structure of the GluN1–GluN2B (GluN1–2B) NMDAR in its open state bound to a positive allosteric modulator. This process rotates and bends the pore-forming helices in GluN1 and GluN2B, altering the symmetry of the TMD channel from pseudofourfold to twofold. Structures of GluN1–2B NMDAR in apo and single-liganded states showed that binding of either glycine or glutamate alone leads to distinct GluN1–2B dimer arrangements but insufficient tension in the LBD–TMD linker for channel opening. This mechanistic framework identifies a key determinant for channel gating and a potential pharmacological strategy for modulating NMDAR activity.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07742-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:632:y:2024:i:8023:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07742-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07742-0

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().