EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The importance of family-based sampling for biobanks

Neil M. Davies (), Gibran Hemani, Jenae M. Neiderhiser, Hilary C. Martin, Melinda C. Mills, Peter M. Visscher, Loïc Yengo, Alexander Strudwick Young and Matthew C. Keller ()
Additional contact information
Neil M. Davies: University College London
Gibran Hemani: University of Bristol
Jenae M. Neiderhiser: The Pennsylvania State University
Hilary C. Martin: Wellcome Genome Campus
Melinda C. Mills: University of Groningen
Peter M. Visscher: The University of Queensland
Loïc Yengo: The University of Queensland
Alexander Strudwick Young: UCLA Anderson School of Management
Matthew C. Keller: University of Colorado at Boulder

Nature, 2024, vol. 634, issue 8035, 795-803

Abstract: Abstract Biobanks aim to improve our understanding of health and disease by collecting and analysing diverse biological and phenotypic information in large samples. So far, biobanks have largely pursued a population-based sampling strategy, where the individual is the unit of sampling, and familial relatedness occurs sporadically and by chance. This strategy has been remarkably efficient and successful, leading to thousands of scientific discoveries across multiple research domains, and plans for the next wave of biobanks are underway. In this Perspective, we discuss the strengths and limitations of a complementary sampling strategy for future biobanks based on oversampling of close genetic relatives. Such family-based samples facilitate research that clarifies causal relationships between putative risk factors and outcomes, particularly in estimates of genetic effects, because they enable analyses that reduce or eliminate confounding due to familial and demographic factors. Family-based biobank samples would also shed new light on fundamental questions across multiple fields that are often difficult to explore in population-based samples. Despite the potential for higher costs and greater analytical complexity, the many advantages of family-based samples should often outweigh their potential challenges.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07721-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07721-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07721-5

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07721-5