A cryptic role for reciprocal helping in a cooperatively breeding bird

Alexis D. Earl (), Gerald G. Carter (), Arden G. Berlinger, Elkana Korir, Shailee S. Shah, Wilson N. Watetu and Dustin R. Rubenstein ()
Additional contact information
Alexis D. Earl: Columbia University
Gerald G. Carter: Princeton University
Arden G. Berlinger: Columbia University
Elkana Korir: Mpala Research Centre
Shailee S. Shah: Columbia University
Wilson N. Watetu: Mpala Research Centre
Dustin R. Rubenstein: Columbia University

Nature, 2025, vol. 642, issue 8067, 381-388

Abstract: Abstract Identifying the mechanisms that underlie cooperation is fundamental to biology1. The most complex form of cooperation in vertebrates occurs in cooperative breeders, in which helpers forego reproduction and assist in raising the young of others, typically relatives2. Not all cooperative societies, however, are kin-based—nearly half of all avian3 and mammalian4 cooperative breeders form mixed-kin societies, much like those of humans5. Kin selection in mixed-kin societies occurs when individuals gain indirect fitness from the preferential helping of relatives6, but helpers also frequently assist non-kin7, highlighting a potential role for direct fitness in stabilizing cooperative societies7,8. Here, using a 20-year study of superb starlings (Lamprotornis superbus), we examined how direct and indirect fitness jointly influence helping behaviour. Although we detected kin-biased helping (demonstrating kin selection), non-kin helping was common despite opportunities to aid kin. Unexpectedly, specific pairs maintained long-term reciprocal helping relationships by swapping social roles across their lifetimes—a subtle pattern of reciprocity requiring decades of observation to detect. Given the frequency of non-kin helping and the occurrence of reciprocal helping among both kin and non-kin, helping behaviour in superb starlings seems to be greatly influenced by direct fitness. However, the relative importance of direct and indirect fitness varied with helpers’ sex and dispersal history. By uncovering a cryptic yet crucial role of long-term reciprocal helping, we suggest that reciprocity may be an underappreciated mechanism promoting the stability of cooperatively breeding societies.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08958-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:642:y:2025:i:8067:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08958-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08958-4

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().