The Adventures of Pension Reform in Russia: Where Are the Mistakes?

V. Danielyan and V. Polterovich
Additional contact information
V. Danielyan: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
V. Polterovich: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Виктор Меерович Полтерович

Journal of the New Economic Association, 2019, vol. 42, issue 2, 186-194

Abstract: Pension reform continues for many years, but its goals have not been achieved: the attempt to introduce the fully-funded system failed, the Pension Fund still relies on the transfers from the state budget, and the increase in the retirement age has caused mass discontent among the population. Comparing the general recommendations for reforming (Polterovich, 2007, 2012a) and the actual policy, we find that the reformers repeated standard mistakes. They tried to copy the modern Western institutions, not taking into account the experience of developing countries and the present resources, as well as cultural and institutional constraints. They didn't seek to compensate the losers; did not predict the natural reaction of citizens to reforms that reduce their welfare; they ignored a number of other costs of reform, including reducing the level of participation due to the exit of workers to the shadow sector. In addition, the goals of the reform were formulated not quite correctly. Besides, the analysis shows that, while continuing pension reforms, it is necessary to consider more consistently the requirements of gradualism and flexibility.

Keywords: pension reform; pay-as-you-go system; fully-funded system; retirement age; reform costs; gradual reform; institutional flexibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 E02 H55 O43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2019-42-186-194r.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nea:journl:y:2019:i:42:p:186-194

DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2019-42-2-11

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the New Economic Association is currently edited by Victor Polterovich and Aleksandr Rubinshtein

More articles in Journal of the New Economic Association from New Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexey Tcharykov ().