Testing a von Liebig Crop Response Function against Polynomial Specifications

Christopher Ackello-Ogutu, Quirino Paris and William A. Williams

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1985, vol. 67, issue 4, 873-880

Abstract: Crop responses to fertilizers traditionally have been specified as polynomial functions. Recently, criticisms were raised against such specifications because they force substitution between nutrients and overestimate the optimal fertilizer quantity. With those criticisms, an alternative crop response function was presented in the form of a minimum function which equates the realized output to the production potential associated with a limiting input. In this paper a nonnested test is performed to discriminate between the two rival specifications. The results of this test reject the hypothesis that a crop response is of the polynomial type, while they do not reject the hypothesis that it is of the minimum and plateau type.

Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241829 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:4:p:873-880.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().