Gains and Losses of Sugar Program Policy Options

Gwo-Jiun M. Leu, Andrew Schmitz and Ronald D. Knutson

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987, vol. 69, issue 3, 591-602

Abstract: High domestic sugar prices supported by U.S. sugar policy have induced a significant substitution of corn sweeteners for sugar. Recognizing the close relationship between sugar and corn sweeteners, this study applies a general equilibrium approach to evaluate the distributional effects of three different policy options (i.e., quota, tariff, and deficiency payment) on sugar related interest groups. The results show that the current quota policy, intended ostensibly to protect domestic sugar producers, have hurt foreign exporters. It will harm domestic sugar producers if the trend continues. Additionally, the quota program is the most expensive of the options considered.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241694 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:3:p:591-602.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().