EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparison of Alternative Crop Response Models

Michael D. Frank, Bruce R. Beattie and Mary E. Embleton

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1990, vol. 72, issue 3, 597-603

Abstract: Three parsimonious models are hypothesized to represent com yield response to nitrogen and phosphorus. Each model imposes specific restrictions with regard to the elasticity of factor substitution and growth plateau. Nonnested hypothesis tests are used to evaluate the competing hypotheses. The results support the restrictions imposed by the Mitscherlich-Baule model. For these data, corn response is characterized by limited substitution between nitrogen and phosphorus and a growth plateau. Further, the cost of using optimal input levels implied by the Mitscherlich-Baule if it were not “true” is small relative to the other parsimonious forms and a translog approximation.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243029 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:72:y:1990:i:3:p:597-603.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:72:y:1990:i:3:p:597-603.