Preferences for Pesticide Regulation

John Horowitz

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994, vol. 76, issue 3, 396-406

Abstract: I look at consumer preferences for pesticide regulation. The analysis is based on a random telephone survey of households. There is a distinct preference for pesticide regulation over an alternative risk reduction proposal (auto exhaust regulation) when both regulations are hypothesized to cost the same and save the same number of lives. Such preference has a surprisingly broad demographic base. However, when the potential numbers of lives saved are different under the two programs, almost 71% of the subjects preferred the regulation that saved the most lives regardless of the risk source.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243652 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:76:y:1994:i:3:p:396-406.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().