Measuring the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost-Benefit Ratio

William Masters and Alex Winter-Nelson

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995, vol. 77, issue 2, 243-250

Abstract: The Domestic Resource Cost (DRC) indicator is widely used in developing countries to measure comparative advantage and guide policy reforms. In this paper we demonstrate that the DRC formula is biased against activities that rely heavily on domestic factors (land and labor), and that a simple Social Cost-Benefit (SCB) ratio is a generally superior measure of social profitability. The SCB uses the same data as the DRC in a formula which does not distort profitability rankings. The policy significance of improved measurement is shown using data from Kenya, where the DRC overstates the relative profitability of activities using large amounts of tradable inputs.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243534 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:77:y:1995:i:2:p:243-250.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().