Transfer Costs, Spatial Arbitrage, and Testing for Food Market Integration

Bob Baulch

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, vol. 79, issue 2, 477-487

Abstract: Conventional tests for food market integration ask, often misleadingly, whether prices in different locations move together. In this paper an alternative methodology, the parity bounds model (PBM), is developed which uses information on transfer costs in addition to food prices to assess the efficiency of spatial arbitrage. Monte Carlo experiments using data generated by a point-space spatial price equilibrium model show the PBM to be statistically reliable. An application to Philippine rice markets demonstrates that the PBM detects efficient arbitrage when other tests do not. Copyright 1997, Oxford University Press.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (198)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1244145 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:79:y:1997:i:2:p:477-487

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().