The Structure of Wages and Benefits in the U.S. Pork Industry
James Kliebenstein and
Peter Orazem
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, vol. 81, issue 1, 144-163
Abstract:
Pork production has evolved from relatively small, family-run operations toward large-scale operations with several employees. Important questions about the structure of compensation in this rapidly changing labor market are answered using probit and ordered probit models and data from a national survey of pork producers and their employees. The results suggest (i) the structure of wages in pork production is consistent with more developed labor markets; (ii) employees earn a wage premium for using advanced technology and working in larger operations; and (iii) employees are willing to accept lower wages in exchange for better benefits and working conditions. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1244457 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: The Structure of Wages and Benefits in the U.S. Pork Industry (1999)
Working Paper: The Structure of Wages and Benefits in the U.S. Pork Industry (1999) 
Working Paper: Structure of Wages and Benefits in the U.S. Pork Industry (1996) 
Working Paper: STRUCTURE OF WAGES AND BENEFITS IN THE U.S. PORK INDUSTRY (1996) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:81:y:1999:i:1:p:144-163
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu
More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().