Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations

Christopher Azevedo, Joseph Herriges and Catherine Kling

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, vol. 85, issue 3, 525-537

Abstract: This article models the recreation demand for Iowa wetlands, combining survey data on both actual usage patterns (i.e., revealed preferences (RPs)) and anticipated changes to those patterns under hypothetical increases in trip costs (i.e., stated preferences (SPs)). We formulate and test specific hypotheses concerning potential sources of bias in each approach and discuss what can be learned about the validity of the models from such tests. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (56)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-8276.00453 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations (2003)
Working Paper: Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:85:y:2003:i:3:p:525-537

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().