Bidding for WIC Infant Formula Contracts: Do Non-WIC Customers Subsidize WIC Customers?

David Davis ()

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2012, vol. 94, issue 1, 80-96

Abstract: Although the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) food-assistance program purchases over half of all U.S. infant formula, I find it does not affect wholesale prices. I estimate infant-formula marginal cost and find it low compared with the wholesale price, implying large price-cost markups. But I find the program does not affect markups. Instead, the program gives preference to one firm's brand, and that brand attains a prominence in stores that results in larger sales to nonparticipants. The preference is valuable to firms and they bid with rebates to attain exclusive approved status, which results in significant cost savings to the program. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aar086 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Bidding for WIC infant formula contracts: Do non-WIC customers subsidize WIC customers? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:94:y:2012:i:1:p:80-96

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().