Expenditure Response to Increases in In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Timothy Beatty and Charlotte J. Tuttle

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, vol. 97, issue 2, 390-404

Abstract: Economic theory predicts that households who receive less in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits than they spend on food will treat SNAP benefits as if they were cash. However, empirical tests of these predictions draw different conclusions. In this study, we reexamine this question using recent increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, the largest of which was due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We find that increases in benefits cause households to increase their food budget share by more than would be predicted by theory. Results are robust to a host of specification tests.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aau097 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Expenditure response to increases in in-kind transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:2:p:390-404.

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().