The Government as Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Model
Theodore Eisenberg and
Henry Farber
American Law and Economics Review, 2003, vol. 5, issue 1, 94-133
Abstract:
We develop a model of the plaintiff's decision to file a lawsuit that has implications for how differences between the federal government and private litigants translate into differences in trial rates and plaintiff win rates at trial. Our case selection model generates a set of predictions for relative trial rates and plaintiff win rates, depending on the type of case and whether the government is defendant or plaintiff. To test the model, we use data on about 474,000 cases filed in federal district court between 1979 and 1994 in the areas of personal injury and job discrimination, in which the federal government and private parties work under roughly similar legal rules. We find broad support for the predictions of the model. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: The Government as Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Model (1999) 
Working Paper: The Government As Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Model (1999) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:5:y:2003:i:1:p:94-133
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
American Law and Economics Review is currently edited by J.J. Prescott and Albert Choi
More articles in American Law and Economics Review from American Law and Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().