Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey
Lionel Hubbard and
Riccardo Scarpa ()
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2010, vol. 32, issue 2, 275-297
Higher animal welfare standards increase costs along the supply chain of certified animal-friendly products (AFP). Since the market outcome of certified AFP depends on consumer confidence toward supply chain operators complying with these standards, the role of trust in consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for AFP is paramount. Results from a contingent valuation survey administered in five European Union countries show that WTP estimates were sensitive to robust measures of consumer trust for certified AFP. Deriving the WTP effect of a single food category on total food expenditure is difficult for survey respondents; hence, a budget approach was employed to facilitate this process. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Journal Article: Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010)
Working Paper: Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:32:y:2010:i:2:p:275-297
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy is currently edited by Timothy Park, Tomislav Vukina and Ian Sheldon
More articles in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .