Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two?
John M. McNamara,
Alasdair I. Houston,
Zolta´n Barta and
Behavioral Ecology, 2003, vol. 14, issue 3, 301-310
We analyze models of parental care, providing the first systematic comparison of the care given to young by one parent versus by two parents. In the Houston-Davies model of care, young always do better with two parents rather than with one parent. When one parent decides about its level of care before the other, then the young may do better with one parent when the costs of care for the parents are asymmetric. When the level of parental effort is reached by negotiation, there are cases in which young do better with one parent, even when costs are symmetric. The analysis suggests empirical ways to differentiate between different response rules. Copyright 2003.
Keywords: game theory; mate removal; negotiation; parental effort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:3:p:301-310
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Mark Elgar
More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().