Sympatry affects the evolution of genetic versus cultural determination of song

Helen Olofsson and Maria R. Servedio

Behavioral Ecology, 2008, vol. 19, issue 3, 596-604

Abstract: One hypothesis explaining the species richness of the songbirds is based on the fact that these species generally acquire their songs socially rather than genetically. Here we consider the outcome of secondary contact between birds that have developed distinct song dialects in allopatry. We ask 2 questions: 1) given a fixed probability of learning, how do the songs evolve in sympatry and 2) would evolution tend to increase or decrease the genetic, versus cultural, determination of song in this situation? We assume that the 2 local dialects can be both genetically determined and learned via song copying, whereas a third category of song, mixed song, is only learned. We evaluate both questions assuming 3 different ways that mixed song can be generated in addition to learning via copying. We find that when the probability of learning is fixed, local dialects can generally be maintained even when a substantial majority of males produce learned songs. Song differentiation will, however, be lost if song learning itself can evolve. This is partly a result of a positive feedback mechanism; mixed songs are readily accepted by all females, leading to selection favoring an allele which increases the probability that males will produce those songs. This in turn increases the frequency of mixed songs, making it harder for dialects to be maintained. As human disturbance alters species ranges, partially differentiated populations may increasingly come into contact; this work predicts that song differentiation may indeed tend to be lost under a significant proportion of these conditions. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn002 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:596-604

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().