Programmed versus stimulus-driven antiparasitic grooming in a desert rodent

Hadas Hawlena, Dikla Bashary, Zvika Abramsky, Irina S. Khokhlova and Boris R. Krasnov

Behavioral Ecology, 2008, vol. 19, issue 5, 929-935

Abstract: We tested 2 hypotheses concerning regulation of grooming in flea-infested rodents and examined if 2 grooming components, scan and scratch grooming, are controlled by programmed and stimulus-driven regulation, respectively. The programmed grooming hypothesis proposes central programming that periodically evokes a bout of grooming to remove ectoparasites before they are attached and predicts that juvenile rodents 1) regardless of infestation status will invest more time in grooming (the body size principle) and 2) sustain lower flea densities than adults. The stimulus-driven grooming hypothesis postulates a direct response to irritation from ectoparasite bites and predicts that under flea-free conditions, 1) the stimulus-driven grooming regulation will not be activated, thereby neither juveniles nor adults will engage in grooming, but under flea infestation, 2) adults will invest more time in grooming than juveniles and sustain similar flea densities. We recorded the behavior of adult and juvenile flea-parasitized and nonparasitized rodents and quantified the frequency and duration of the 2 grooming components. Flea infestation increased the time devoted to grooming, supporting the existence of a regulation mechanism. However, the results did not support the dominance of neither hypothesis. Both forms of grooming were affected similarly by flea infestation and host age, hence may not necessarily be linked to a given regulation mechanism. Regardless of infestation status, time devoted to grooming was lower in juveniles, and both age groups sustained fleas at similar densities. We suggest that the assumptions and predictions of the 2 hypotheses should take into account the morphology and natural history of the host organism. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn046 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:929-935

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().