Living with the dead: when the body count rises, prey stick around

Virgil Fievet, Pauline Le Guigo, Julianne Casquet, Denis Poinsot and Yannick Outreman

Behavioral Ecology, 2009, vol. 20, issue 2, 251-257

Abstract: Most terrestrial prey species are assumed to assess predation risk by detecting predators directly rather than using cues of previous attacks on conspecifics. However, such cues might represent valuable information, and prey can be expected to respond to the presence of congeners killed by enemies. Such cues are available in aphid colonies attacked by parasitic wasps because they do not remove parasitized hosts from the colony. Colonies are thus often a mixture of healthy, parasitized, and killed aphids, which corpses ("mummies") stay attached to the plant and can be encountered by live aphids. Aphids exhibit a dispersal polyphenism. Recent studies show that they produce more winged offspring when directly exposed to natural enemies or to alarm pheromone emitted by conspecifics. We hypothesized that aphids perceive the corpses of congeners killed by parasitoids and respond by increasing the production of winged morphs, but we surprisingly found the opposite. We determined the adaptive value of this response by analyzing the foraging behavior of parasitoids in aphid colonies with killed aphids ("mummies"). Parasitoid females responded to the presence of mummies by reducing both their time allocation and parasitism activity in the patch. The strategy of aphids to reduce emigration (i.e., they produce more wingless morphs when mummies are present) is adaptive because the presence of killed congeners reduces parasitoid pressure on colonies. This demonstrates that the remains of individuals killed by natural enemies can still have an ecological relevance in prey populations and that enemy-induced phenotypic plasticity depends on the type of predation cues. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp014 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:251-257

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().