Brood exchange experiments and chemical analyses shed light on slave rebellion in ants
Alexandra Achenbach,
Volker Witte and
Susanne Foitzik
Behavioral Ecology, 2010, vol. 21, issue 5, 948-956
Abstract:
Parasites and hosts frequently engage in coevolutionary arms races, in which newly developed host defenses will be counteracted by parasite adaptations. Slave-making ants are virulent social parasites that trick enslaved host workers into caring for their brood. These slaves also have to accept stolen host pupae, which slavemakers retrieve during raids. Previously, selection was thought to be unable to act on traits of these enslaved host ants. Yet, a recent study demonstrated rebellion of enslaved Temnothorax workers, which selectively killed female pupae of the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus. This defensive trait could lower the costs of parasitism because slowed growth of parasite nests reduces raiding impact on related neighboring host colonies. In cross-fostering experiments, we investigated the acceptance of host and parasite pupae by Temnothorax workers in parasitized and unparasitized colonies. Host workers commonly killed transferred pupae, and the presence of the social parasite only increased acceptance of parasite pupae in 1 host species and that of heterospecific host pupae in a second host. Parasite pupae survived better when transferred to sympatric host colonies than to allopatric ones, possibly indicating local adaptation in the parasite P. americanus. Cuticular hydrocarbon analyses explain this with chemical differences in pupae profiles between communities. Overall, parasite and host pupae have highly divergent profiles. Hence, cuticular hydrocarbons can potentially be used by host workers to identify and destroy parasite pupae. The parasite P. americanus should be under strong selection to adapt its pupal recognition cues to those of its hosts to counteract slave rebellion. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq008 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:948-956
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett
More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().