Immune activation but not male quality affects female current reproductive investment in a dung beetle

Leeann T. Reaney and Robert J. Knell

Behavioral Ecology, 2010, vol. 21, issue 6, 1367-1372

Abstract: Changes in female reproductive investment can have large effects on offspring quality and thus maternal fitness. An immune activation is often expected to lead to a reduction in reproductive effort in order to release resources necessary for costly resistance to infection. Alternatively, an increase in investment in current reproduction may occur in order to maximize lifetime reproductive success: the so-called "terminal investment" effect. Additionally, females are expected to invest more in their reproductive effort when mating with higher quality males. Here, we investigate how an immune response and male quality affect the reproductive decisions made by female dung beetles, Euoniticellus intermedius. Female dung beetles invest a large amount of energy into each offspring, building large brood balls into which a single egg is laid. Maternal investment is therefore easily estimated from the number and size of the brood balls constructed. We found no affect of the mated male quality on female current reproductive investment. However, immune activation with lipopolysaccharide caused a significant reduction in the number of brood balls produced but did not affect brood ball size. An immune activation therefore caused resources to be diverted away from reproduction, as predicted by the "cost of immunity" hypothesis. Although life-history theory predicts 2 potentially opposing outcomes of an immune activation, a summary of studies investigating the trade-off between immune investment and current reproduction fails to provide any clear trends of what may predict the direction of this trade-off. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq139 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1367-1372

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().