Quality, need, or hunger; begging the question

Camilla A. Hinde and H. Charles J. Godfray

Behavioral Ecology, 2011, vol. 22, issue 6, 1147-1148

Abstract: Why do birds and mammals beg and bleat in ways that are energetically wasteful and risk other fitness consequences such as attracting predators? Most workers assume that some genetic conflict is involved, either between parents and offspring or amongst siblings. Mock et al. (2011) provide a thoughtful analysis of the theories available concentrating on those that assume the parent actively chooses which young to feed and that begging and bleating are evolved signals. They argue that the field has concentrated too much on the signal being one of need rather than of quality and discuss a third alternative--signals of hunger. We offer here a few comments in support of Mock et al.'s sensible call for greater debate on alternative mechanisms, though argue that most available evidence supports begging as a signal of need. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr117 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:6:p:1147-1148

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().