Male survival patterns do not depend on male allocation to sexual competition in large herbivores

Jean-François Lemaître and Jean-Michel Gaillard

Behavioral Ecology, 2013, vol. 24, issue 2, 421-428

Abstract: Understanding causes of between-sex differences in survival patterns is a long-standing challenge in evolutionary biology. Interspecific differences in male allocation to sexual competition have been suggested to shape species-specific patterns of male adult survival and actuarial senescence, and thereby the extent of between-sex differences in these parameters. Sexual competition is complex and involves both competition for gaining mating (i.e., precopulatory competition) and competition for fertilization opportunities (i.e., postcopulatory competition). However, to date, studies seeking for a relationship between allocation to precopulatory competition and male absolute adult survival have led to contrasting results and the influence of postcopulatory competition on these parameters has never been yet investigated. To fill the gap, we performed a comparative study in large herbivores using median lifespan (i.e., age at which only half of the initial cohort is still alive) and actuarial intensity of senescence (i.e., number of years elapsed between the median lifespan and the age where only one-tenth of the initial cohort is still alive). As expected, we found a lower adult survival and a stronger actuarial intensity of senescence in males than in females. Conversely, we did not find any evidence that variation in male allocation to pre- and/or postcopulatory traits explain between-species differences of both absolute and relative adult survival and intensity of actuarial senescence. These results challenge the idea that allocation to specific traits associated with sexual competition is responsible for between-sex differences in survival and senescence patterns generally reported in mammals.

Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars179 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:421-428.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().